* To display this page correctly, you need a web browser with JavaScript support.
logo
• Site Map• Contact• Home
AboutPartnership Communities Partners Programs Members
 
 

Government Relations

Legislative Update

May 20, 2009


Welcome to the Partnership's Legislative Update e-newsletter, highlighting national legislative issues of interest to charitable gift and estate planners.

In this Issue:


Gift Annuities Face Criticism in Press, on Capitol Hill

On May 12, the Wall Street Journal published an article, “Donors Find Gift Annuities Can Stop Giving,” which raises concerns about gift annuity programs that are largely unfounded. Read the Wall Street Journal article here.

The Partnership has responded with a letter to the editor, and other individuals and organizations, including the American Council on Gift Annuities, have also responded. Although the negative publicity is unfortunate, this article does provide an opportunity to remind donors, legislators and the general public about the true benefits and safety of gift annuities, based on the experience of thousands of charitable organizations across the nation. The Partnership’s will share correct information with legislators and regulators in Washington, DC.

Links to other responses to the WSJ article and resources to help planners address concerns about gift annuities are available on the PPP homepage.

Also, late last month, while commenting on the FY 2010 budget resolution and a PPP-supported amendment to extend and expand the IRA Charitable Rollover (see story below), Sen. Charles Grassley (R-IA), Ranking Member of the Senate Finance Committee, labeled “split-interest trusts” as “worrisome.” He continued, “just like with donor-advised funds and supporting organizations, the contribution does not result in an immediate benefit actually providing services while the donor receives a significant tax benefit at the time of the contribution.” Senator Grassley concluded his remarks, “we should make sure that grant-making entities, including split-interest trusts, are accountable for paying out minimum amounts to actual charities before we allow them to receive IRA rollovers.” Despite these remarks, Sen. Grassley did not object to the PPP-supported amendment, which was ultimately included in the budget resolution by the unanimous consent of the Senate.

PPP is working with staff for both Sen. Grassley and Sen. Byron Dorgan (D-ND), the sponsor of the IRA Charitable Rollover amendment, as well as Sen. Baucus (D-MT), Chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, to address Sen. Grassley’s concerns and advocate for expansion of the IRA Charitable Rollover this year.


Congress Adopts a Final FY 2010 Budget Resolution with Several Provisions on Charitable Giving

Both the House and Senate have now approved a fiscal year 2010 budget resolution, which contains a number of provisions related to charitable giving issues. The budget resolution is a non-binding document, setting out a blueprint for how Congress will move major legislation over the next year and how much discretionary spending will be available through the annual appropriations process.

The resolution calls on Congress to pass legislation that extends “incentives for enhanced charitable giving from individual retirement accounts, including life-income gifts.” This language was originally added to the Senate-passed budget resolution by Sen. Byron Dorgan (D-ND), sponsor of the Public Good IRA Rollover Act of 2009 (S. 864).

The resolution also provides for a permanent extension of the estate tax at 2009 levels (thus doing away with the 2010 repeal). Under such an approach, individuals could exempt $3.5 million from taxes ($7 million for couples), with amounts above that taxed at 45 percent. The exemption threshold would also be adjusted for inflation in future years. President Obama also supports this approach to estate tax reform.


Administration Continues to Push for Limit on Charitable Deductions

On May 11, the Treasury Department released its “green book,” which outlines the Administration’s fiscal year 2010 tax proposals. This publication, like the budget blueprint released by the White House in February, proposes reducing from 35 percent to 28 percent the tax rate at which taxpayers earning more than $250,000 could claim charitable deductions. The proposal has faced widespread opposition from groups representing the charitable sector and lawmakers have also gone on-the-record against it.

The Partnership for Philanthropic Planning has issued a statement in response to the Administration’s proposal. The Partnership believes that tax incentives for charitable giving send an essential message about the value our country places on voluntary giving and the important role of charities in meeting critical individual and community needs. The true beneficiaries of the charitable donation are not the generous Americans who make charitable gifts, but those in need who are served by the work of charitable organizations. 


Sens. Baucus, Grassley Release “Policy Options” Aimed at Nonprofit Hospitals

Sen. Max Baucus (D-MT) and Charles Grassley (R-IA), Chairman and Ranking Member, respectively, of the Senate Finance Committee recently released a number of legislative proposals for financing health care reform legislation. Some of these proposals would affect the work of nonprofit hospitals, which compared to for-profit hospitals, receive several key subsidies from the federal government. Specifically, under the policy options released, nonprofit hospitals would be required to maintain a minimal level of charitable activity, limit charges to uninsured, indigent patients, and limit aggressive collection actions. Hospitals that do not meet those requirements would be subject to an excise tax. The Committee is accepting public comments on these proposals, which can be emailed to Health_Reform@finance-dem.senate.gov.

Sen. Baucus and Grassley met with members of the Senate Finance Committee to discuss these options on May 20. They hope to mark-up heath care reform legislation in the Committee as early as next month.

It still is unclear if the proposal to cap the tax rate for itemized deductions, which includes the charitable deduction, at 28 percent for wealthier individuals will also be on the table as a way to finance health care reform (see story above).


Sen. Hatch to Replace Sen. Grassley on Finance Committee in 2011

According to a plan ratified by the Senate Republican Conference, Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-UT) will replace Sen. Charles Grassley (R-IA) as the top Republican on the Senate Finance Committee beginning in 2011. Sen. Hatch has served on the Senate Finance Committee since 1991. Sen. Grassley will move over to become the top Republican on the Senate Judiciary Committee.

Under Senate Republican Conference rules, members are limited to six cumulative years as Chairman of a committee, and six cumulative years as Ranking Member. Since 2001, Sen. Grassley has served as Chairman of the Finance Committee from 2003 through 2006. By the end of 2010, he will have served as Ranking Member in 2001 through 2002 and 2007 through 2010. If Republicans regained control of the Senate in the next election, Sen. Grassley could technically serve as Chairman of Senate Finance for two more years.

Lawmakers typically do not consider committee assignments this far in advance, but the recent defection from the Republican Party of Sen. Arlen Specter (D-PA), who was Ranking Member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, set off this latest shuffle.


IRS Releases New Table on Future Interests

The IRS has released Publications 1457, 1458 and 1459 in which it illustrates the method for using actuarial factors for certain income tax valuations of future interests. Included is a new mortality Table 2000CM, which is effective May 1, 2009. Compared to the existing Table 90CM, life expectancies under the 2000 Table are slightly greater each year until age 101; from age 102 up to the maximum calculated age of 110 years there is actually a decrease. The rate of increase in life expectancy ends at age 76. Gift planners will find that the increase in life expectancy increases the value of an income interest, and reduces the value of a remainder interest.

SiteMap Copyright